Why VHS Covers Looked More Exciting Than the Movies

A VHS box had one job and about four seconds to do it. Somebody was walking along a shelf, scanning sideways, and the box had to stop them.

That is a brutal design brief and it produced some of the most aggressive commercial illustration of the era. Every box was competing with two hundred others at the same eye level, in a shop with bad lighting, against titles the customer had actually heard of. Subtlety was not an option.

They were painted, which changes everything

Most of the best VHS art was illustration rather than photography, and usually airbrushed. That was partly practical. Getting usable photographs of an entire cast in one composition is expensive and logistically painful. Hiring an artist to paint whatever you wanted is neither.

So the artist could do things a camera cannot. Put the hero large in the foreground and the entire third act behind him at a smaller scale. Float three faces in the sky. Add an explosion that never occurs in the film. Give the lead a jaw that no human has. Include a vehicle that appears for eleven seconds.

The result is that a lot of these covers are not depicting a scene. They are depicting the film's ambition, compressed into one image, at maximum intensity. It is closer to a poster for a circus than to a still photograph, and it works for the same reasons.

The gap between the box and the movie

Everybody has the memory of renting something on the strength of the cover and being disappointed at home. This was so common it was almost a genre.

Direct-to-video releases were the worst offenders and also the most fun. A film with a small budget and no name actors could still afford a spectacular painted cover, because the cover was the entire marketing budget and the only thing a renter would ever see. So the art promised a large-scale science fiction epic and the film delivered forty minutes in a warehouse.

This was not really fraud. Everybody understood the arrangement. The cover was a pitch, the film was the film, and the two were related in spirit rather than in fact.

Streaming has removed this completely, and it is a real loss. A thumbnail cannot lie to you at that scale. It is too small to promise anything, and you can read the rating and check the runtime before committing, which is efficient and takes all the gambling out of it.

The back of the box did the closing

Front to stop you, back to convert you. The back was three or four small stills, a paragraph of copy, and the running time.

The stills were always chosen badly, in the sense that they never included the good parts, and they were frequently in a different aspect ratio to everything else on the box. The copy was written in a voice that exists nowhere else, all present tense and rhetorical questions. The running time was the number you checked to see whether the film was long enough to be worth the rental.

Reading a back cover took maybe twenty seconds and it was a genuine part of the evening. There were people who read fifteen of them before choosing, standing in the aisle, comparing.

The physical box was designed for a shelf

Large clamshell cases and cardboard slipcases both existed and both had a job. Big enough that the art was almost poster-scale, tall enough to be the dominant object on a shelf, with a spine wide enough for a title you could read from a distance.

That spine mattered more than it sounds. Most of the time in a rental shop you were looking at spines, not covers. Only the featured titles got faced out. So the design had to survive being reduced to a two centimeter strip of color and type, and the good ones did.

Why the style keeps getting revived

The visual language of this art is extremely specific and easy to recognize: hard airbrush gradients, chrome type with a bevel, hot magenta and cyan against black, a grid, a sunset, faces floating over a landscape.

It gets used constantly now in synthwave and retro design, including by us. The reason it works is not just nostalgia. It is that the style was optimized for exactly the problem that most contemporary imagery has, which is being seen briefly, at small size, next to a hundred competitors. A design that could stop somebody in a video store aisle is well suited to stopping somebody scrolling.

Our own VHS sneakers at Newretro.Net are built on the label side of that world rather than the cover art side, but it is the same aesthetic family and the same logic. Loud enough to register immediately, specific enough to be recognized by anybody who was there.

The honest verdict

A lot of the movies were bad. Genuinely, unambiguously bad, and the covers knew it, which is why they were working so hard.

But an enormous amount of skill went into those boxes. Real illustrators, painting real artwork, under commercial pressure, for films that mostly did not deserve them. Most of the artists were uncredited on the box.

The films are largely forgotten. The art has been in continuous circulation for forty years and is currently being copied by people who were not born when it was made, which is a better outcome than any of the movies got.


Leave a comment

Please note, comments must be approved before they are published

This site is protected by hCaptcha and the hCaptcha Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.